In response to these comments I've added a new section on responsible media sources - I recommend Associated Press, Defence Express and Kyiv Independent for a start to get better idea of the situation - though none of them go into the level of detail I do here and none of them are written to help scared people. If you read these sources it will help you to undestand that what I say here is factual, well grounded and true.
I feel like I tend to panic when everyone else tends to panic and the threatening statements of Russia makes me even more concerned that we will somehow be dragged into this war or that at some point Russia will have to respond to us directly. A lot of concerns and worse case scenarios floating around in my head as a person with OCD and anxiety.
The best thing is to reduce your exposure to the news which is right now full of FALSE scary clickbait.
The ONLY REASON Russia makes those threatening statements is to try to get Biden to reverse this permission which is not in any way any threat to the Rusisan Federation.
Ukraine is NOT ABLE TO THREATEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION even if it wanted to which it obviously doesn't.
All Ukraine wants is for Russia to get out of Ukraine. Then the war is over.
I'm not going to lie. This doesn't make me feel good. Mental health is taking a dump just thinking of what could happen from this. Even after reading your article.
That is just because of the mainstream media hysteria. It is hard for one person to counteract an avalanche of FALSE CLICKBAIT AND SENSASTIONALISM. I have now done another article that reinforces some of these points and may help:
BLOG: The ATACMS permission will MAKE UKRAINE SAFER and is NEVER ANY RISK TO ITS ALLIES
- please don’t be scared by MEDIA CLICKBAIT, SENSATIONALIST BULLS**T and RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA attempts to hobble Ukraine
Which would you say are the most reliable sources (in the UK) on the developments of the war? I've been following the BBC on it mainly but sometimes I see worrying articles from other sources like Tagtik and Reuters and I'm not sure whether they are legitimate sources of news or just scaremongering..
Also the Kyiv Independent is a good source. It shows the Ukrainian point of view. Remember they are the ones that are most at risk of whatever Russia might do and they see this as making them safer.
Unlike the rest of us, they are at risk of being hit by hypsersonic missiles (which hit you before you can hear them) and glide bombs (which you can hear coming but devastate an entire apartment in one go) and every night they get air raid sirens now and many of them now shelter in underground stations and underground shelters from the bombs much like London in the Blitz.
They see this permission as far too little far too late but that it will help a little to reduce the risk from these bombs.
They don't see any risk of a world war
Same also for the Baltic states, or Poland - they would be at the front line in any world war but are not scared because they know all that is BULLS**T.
It means nothing if they do say that as there is no way that Putin attacks NATO. I've added some extra sections from my longer world war 3 debunk which is mid edit, one more two hour session and it shoudl be done.
But I don't find that there looking right now. All they say about Biden’s decision is:
QUOTE STARTS
According to The New York Times the long-range missiles, known as the Army Tactical Missile Systems, or ATACMS will be used against the Russian and North Korean military "to help [Ukraine] defend its forces in the Kursk region of Russia." However, US officials said that they don’t expect that this step will "fundamentally alter the course of the war," the newspaper added.
However, it is not ruled out that Biden may allow to use American missiles to deliver strikes not only on the Kursk Region but also elsewhere in Russia, it noted. "Some U.S. officials said they feared that Ukraine’s use of the missiles across the border could prompt President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to retaliate with force against the United States and its coalition partners," The New York Times noted.
That article is just cope, they just say that Trump says he will review all the decisions by Biden's administration which you expect. But it is highly unlikely he removes permission once Ukraine is already using them in this way.
In response to these comments I've added a new section on responsible media sources - I recommend Associated Press, Defence Express and Kyiv Independent for a start to get better idea of the situation - though none of them go into the level of detail I do here and none of them are written to help scared people. If you read these sources it will help you to undestand that what I say here is factual, well grounded and true.
I feel like I tend to panic when everyone else tends to panic and the threatening statements of Russia makes me even more concerned that we will somehow be dragged into this war or that at some point Russia will have to respond to us directly. A lot of concerns and worse case scenarios floating around in my head as a person with OCD and anxiety.
The best thing is to reduce your exposure to the news which is right now full of FALSE scary clickbait.
The ONLY REASON Russia makes those threatening statements is to try to get Biden to reverse this permission which is not in any way any threat to the Rusisan Federation.
Ukraine is NOT ABLE TO THREATEN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION even if it wanted to which it obviously doesn't.
All Ukraine wants is for Russia to get out of Ukraine. Then the war is over.
I'm not going to lie. This doesn't make me feel good. Mental health is taking a dump just thinking of what could happen from this. Even after reading your article.
That is just because of the mainstream media hysteria. It is hard for one person to counteract an avalanche of FALSE CLICKBAIT AND SENSASTIONALISM. I have now done another article that reinforces some of these points and may help:
BLOG: The ATACMS permission will MAKE UKRAINE SAFER and is NEVER ANY RISK TO ITS ALLIES
- please don’t be scared by MEDIA CLICKBAIT, SENSATIONALIST BULLS**T and RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA attempts to hobble Ukraine
READ HERE: https://robertinventor.substack.com/p/the-atacms-permission-will-make-ukraine
TEXT ON GRAPHIC
Mitch McConnel first called on Biden to supply ATACMS to Ukraine on 15th September 2022.
- Ukraine got a few ATACMS a YEAR later
- not enough to do much.
The Ukraine bill got stuck in Congress over winter
- Ukraine got more ATACMS in the spring
- Congress supplied them with NO RESTRICTIONS ON USE IN RUSSIA
Biden added this nonsense restriction
- not to use against targets in Russia
- precisely where a 300 km range missile would be most useful.
Russia got
- 6 months to adapt to them in occupied Ukraine.
If Ukraine has indeed only got permission to use them in Kursk oblast
- it gives Russia more time to adapt.
All this is just PROLONGING THE WAR
There is absolutely NO RISK TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
They are only used against MILITARY targets involved in attacking Ukraine.
When Russia leaves Ukraine the war is over.
Which would you say are the most reliable sources (in the UK) on the developments of the war? I've been following the BBC on it mainly but sometimes I see worrying articles from other sources like Tagtik and Reuters and I'm not sure whether they are legitimate sources of news or just scaremongering..
The Associated press is the least clickbait I know. Try this post by them about the missiles:
https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-russia-war-biden-what-are-atacms-missiles-8d8621321af8c673bd42a5693c2ad1f4 What does Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to use longer-range US weapons mean?
NOTHING in it about any risk to Ukraine's allies.
Also the Kyiv Independent is a good source. It shows the Ukrainian point of view. Remember they are the ones that are most at risk of whatever Russia might do and they see this as making them safer.
https://kyivindependent.com/missiles-will-speak-for-themselves-zelensky/ 'Missiles will speak for themselves' — Zelensky reacts to long-range strike permission reports
Unlike the rest of us, they are at risk of being hit by hypsersonic missiles (which hit you before you can hear them) and glide bombs (which you can hear coming but devastate an entire apartment in one go) and every night they get air raid sirens now and many of them now shelter in underground stations and underground shelters from the bombs much like London in the Blitz.
They see this permission as far too little far too late but that it will help a little to reduce the risk from these bombs.
They don't see any risk of a world war
Same also for the Baltic states, or Poland - they would be at the front line in any world war but are not scared because they know all that is BULLS**T.
I have added a new section on media sources should help
What about Tass' comments that Biden's decison will lead to World War 3 now?
It means nothing if they do say that as there is no way that Putin attacks NATO. I've added some extra sections from my longer world war 3 debunk which is mid edit, one more two hour session and it shoudl be done.
But I don't find that there looking right now. All they say about Biden’s decision is:
QUOTE STARTS
According to The New York Times the long-range missiles, known as the Army Tactical Missile Systems, or ATACMS will be used against the Russian and North Korean military "to help [Ukraine] defend its forces in the Kursk region of Russia." However, US officials said that they don’t expect that this step will "fundamentally alter the course of the war," the newspaper added.
However, it is not ruled out that Biden may allow to use American missiles to deliver strikes not only on the Kursk Region but also elsewhere in Russia, it noted. "Some U.S. officials said they feared that Ukraine’s use of the missiles across the border could prompt President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to retaliate with force against the United States and its coalition partners," The New York Times noted.
https://tass.com/defense/1873729 Biden authorizes use of US long-range weapons to strike inside Russia — media
That is restrained for them.
Also they have this
https://tass.com/world/1873761 Trump may review Biden’s decision on strikes inside Russia with US missiles
That article is just cope, they just say that Trump says he will review all the decisions by Biden's administration which you expect. But it is highly unlikely he removes permission once Ukraine is already using them in this way.
I've updated the blog post and put in extra titles etc to make it clearer also some more graphics.